BAD MEN
Rambsy, Howard, II. Bad Men: Creative Touchstones of Black Writers. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2020.
Howard Rambsy's first book, The Black Arts Enterprise and the Production of African American Poetry
(Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011), examined many aspects of the
Black Arts/Black Aesthetic Movement and gave special attention to
"publishing venues and editorial practices [as] the principle connectors
in the far-reaching transmission of poetry during the black arts era"
(160). Since 2011, Rambsy has used his
website Cultural Front (www.culturalfront.org) as a mega-notebook for
information on
- established and emerging writers (including comprehensive lists of reviews of their work)
- African American literary studies
- digital humanities and ongoing change in digital technologies
- reading experiments with female and male students at Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville and in East St. Louis
- genre changes involving rap, hip hop, and comic books
- changes in cultural attitudes about the production of poetry which result from such institutions as Cave Canem and the Furious Flower Institute and the distribution of prizes and awards for poetry
The wealth of information in Cultural Front has inspired many
critical thinkers to pursue new scholarly projects; it has also served as the
source of Rambsy's authority and his
being esteemed by his peers.
Rambsy makes compelling speculations about pedagogical change necessitated by trends in African American literary and cultural
arenas. HIs gathering of data as
empirical evidence of how cultural
domains function is impressive. If there
is a weak spot in his method, it is a tendency to make hasty albeit tentative
conclusions without scrutinizing the data.
Astute readers get the point quickly. The strength of his efforts, on
the other hand, exists in his sketching
out a needed sociology of African American literature, in his being a
pioneering scholar activist.
While parts of Bad Men: Creative Touchstones of Black Writers are grounded in his
first book, his second book deals mainly with works produced since 2000. Rambsy uses quite general assumptions
regarding ethnic tastes as he makes a
case for inquiry about individual
writers and how use of "bad men/bad boys" as foci for critique
ordains a mixing of qualitative and quantitative procedures . He is fully aware of how vexed
interdisciplinary studies can be, and he makes a clear statement about the
difficulty of joining literary study with creativity research conducted in the
social sciences Nevertheless, he gives
us a fine illustration of how "adopting concepts such as 'creative
domains' and 'problem finding' from creativity research could enhance our
understanding of processes and inventiveness of black writers" (9).
"Rebellious or disobedient
black male characters and historical figures," Rambsy argues, "often
showcase racial problems that stimulate African American writers to address a
range of pertinent issues in original ways" (5). However much one agrees with Rambsy,
intellectual integrity demands careful thinking about the range of pejorative
and complimentary meanings covered by the term "bad men." The term "bad men" is super-slippery. One must be cold in struggling with ideas
about American violence directed against black people, about the concept of the
heroic, and about ugliness and pain as they challenge us in the study of
cultural domains and the practices of everyday life. It is no easy matter to sort out "moral bad men" who
possess commendable consciousness about the need to combat American racism by
any means available and "immoral or amoral bad men" who are often
applauded for blatant criminality. The
task is made exceptionally difficult if one tries to name the value "bad men/boys" have in the
aftermath of the obscene murder of George Floyd and the long history of
murdering black women and men that is ordained by the racial contract that
prevails in the United States.
One must ask, for the sake of
adequate cultural explanation, whether "bad men" as creative
touchstones for writers and other artists are weapons to decimate racism and racists, or psychological defense mechanisms to disguise a suspected futility in endlessly speaking truth to entrenched
inequity.
Like a number of current scholars who
bravely expose the vernacular hypocrisy
and tyranny of academic discourses
regarding American political, racial, and cultural histories, Rambsy has
embraced his own version of a pedagogy of the oppressed to clear pathways into
a future. He provides essential
guidelines, but readers are encouraged to make independent discoveries in
negotiation with Rambsy's arguments. He
is aware the bane of scholarly thinking is the delusion of having arrived at an
answer.
The conversational organization of the book
maximizes readability. The three chapters of Part 1 focus on how Kevin Young,
Tyehimba Jess, and Adrian Matejka endow their writings with bad men, on
ex-slaves as muses, and on characters in literature who are alleged to be race
traitors. Part 2 shifts attention to the
depiction of black boys in Aaron
McGruder's famed Boondocks comic
strip and the significant work Trymaine Lee and Ta-Nehisi Coates in writing
about Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown. Rambsy concludes with optimism, because
he believes "we can invigorate literary studies by examining the works of
black writers utilizing concepts such as problem finding, domains, and
productivity. So many wonderful discoveries await us at the crossroads of
African American literary studies and creativity research" (171).
For students and scholars who
engage in literary and cultural studies, Bad
Men: Creative Touchstones of Black Writers is required reading.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. 6/5/2020 8:15:46 AM
Comments
Post a Comment