DEMOCRATIC DEBATES
"Democratic
Debates" and Four Horses
In response to my question
I must learn to
resist American neo-fascism and survive, must I not?
my cousin Michael wrote:
The debates seem
rather daft, robotic. I really don't
know what to make of them. I listen to
Trump rallies. Impressive, not that I
agree with what he says. I'm sure he
loathes those people who come to his rallies in places like North and South
Carolina. But that's his base, and he
certainly puts on a show. There's something blatantly honest about Trump.
[Michael Cola, August 1, 2019, email to Jerry Ward]
My cousin's words strike me like a revelation that's
always been a part of the totality of the histories of the United States of
America, like a vision that radio, television, and other technologies help many
of us to underestimate. American
citizens are enslaved and tormented by the imperfections of politics. And what seems deeply painful is the
inability to know with any degree of certainty whether four horses ---pale, white, red, and black ---are coming or leaving. Indeed, it is impossible to truly know why
horses rather than elephants were chosen to symbolize profound existential
anxieties.
For me, August 2, 2019 is August 2, 1969 in Vietnam, and
I am listening to Peggy Lee sing
Is that all there
is, is that all there is
If that's all
there is my friends, then let's keep dancing
Let's break out
the booze and have a ball
If that's all
there is
and I broke out the Scotch with my Fourth Infantry
Division buddies
And as I sat there
watching
I had the feeling
that something was missing
And my twenty-six year old black male self was not in
Vietnam because I was patriotic. Hell no. American systemic racism had done an expert job of killing any desire I
might have to be patriotic. And fifty years
later as I sit watching the Democratic Presidential Debates, I yet feel
something is missing. The spectacle of
bad faith in my nation has effectively killed any desire for overmuch hope in a
future for humanity and this planet. No, I do not subscribe to religious
theories of End Time, to the implications of Revelation 6:1-8. I have
simply seen conquest, famine, plague, and war do "actual" jobs within
a grid named "reality."
What I have seen led me to write on June 23, 2019----
Understanding why
fascism is thriving in the United States of America in 2019 pivots on inquiry
about the human will for power,
especially its manifestations in ideological compacts which reinforce vulgar
ideas regarding social order and disorder.
The will for power functions also in American practices of democracy and
communism, in the totality of narratives created in the name of history.
Inquiry is not easy
and neat. It is messy, as messy as the
entanglements that characterize the actual, the real, and the fantastic. Thus,
we must hold fast to doubts about the capacity of language to provide us with
"truth." Language provides data, information that is either
instructive or deceptive, prompts for laughter and cause for tears. Neither foe nor friend, language (an array of
American English with grace notes from non-English languages) in the USA is
more or less a necessary, convenient, demonizing and enthralling instrument
. The instrument is amoral. American citizens are complicit and culpable
in its usage. There's the rub that endlessly delays access to more than
relative, provisional "truths." And one of those "truths"
is this: the pre- and post-Cold War dirt is at once soil and fertilizer for
fascism. Like our 1950s ancestors, we
are existentially constrained to pledge allegiance to abstractions, to
"democracy," to "communism," to "fascism."
From my perspective,
the most attractive albeit temporary
escape from the constraint for African American peoples is to think and behave aggressively as did Cross
Damon in Richard Wright's The Outsider
and to eschew the defensive posture of Bigger Thomas in Wright's Native Son. That choice is the catalyst for an authentic
revolution in a pre-future. Dislocate
language in the space of action. Dismiss
love. Intensify our will for pure power, not for boundless freedom or compromised liberation.
The "democratic debates" reinforce my gut
feelings.
Consider that the twenty Democrats who possess the will
for power are enslaved a version of "reality television. They do not and cannot within the
genre-parameters of televised debate persuasively articulate comprehensive,
fact-informed plans for dealing with the cesspool of American politics in the
context of always changing global events.
Why have none of them said anything intelligent about foreign policy, about
the continuing failure of so-called "white" people to admit they are
race-defined individuals who have color, about the upswing of domestic
terrorism, about American imperialism?
Why has not one of these Democrats suggested that arresting Trump on the
grounds of mental unfitness to be a President is a better solution than impeaching him for alleged political sins? One might think that at least one of the
want-to-be-Presidents would be brave
enough to tell us the Electoral College shat upon the verifiable will of the
voters who in the name of participatory democracy elected Hillary Clinton not
Donald Trump in 2016. Yes, I am aware that breaking the silence
would be very dangerous and would not persuade anyone in the Tribe of Trump to replace passion
(insatiable will ) to hate with a
modicum of cold reason. Miracles do not
happen in situations where American neo-fascism prevails. I calmly anticipate
dwelling for four more years in a circus of horrors as like Voltaire's Candide
I turn my back on Panglossy political
disinformation, cultivate my life-nurturing garden, and allow the plants to
tell me how to continue to struggle. Brutal honesty is all there is.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. August 2, 2019
Comments
Post a Comment