Reawakening the Cold Mind
Reawakening the Cold
Mind
Fukuyama, Francis.
Identity: The Demand for Dignity
and the Politics of Resentment. New
York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.
In
contrast to Allan Bloom's effort in The Closing of the American Mind (1987) to
excoriate his fellow citizens for complicity in allowing higher education to
fail democracy and impoverish the souls of students, Fukuyama makes an effort
to warn his fellow citizens that aspects of the soul ---thymos (craving recognition of dignity), isothymia (demanding "to be respected on an equal basis with
other people") and megalothymia
("the desire to be recognized as superior) ---propagate the multiple
issues that torment contemporary forms of democracy (xiii). There is more than
a little profit in reading Bloom and Fukuyama against one another in order to
grasp how what is now touted as intersectionality
is naught but another name for the complex
simplicity which Richard Wright noted in "Blueprint for Negro
Writing" (1937) is necessary for representation and interpretation.
An
exceptionally avid reader might take up Kwame Anthony Appiah's The Lies That Bind: Rethinking Identity
(New York: Liveright, 2018) as a stick for measuring the merits of Fukuyama and
Bloom, and even go further to give a hearing to Robin DiAngelo's White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White
People to Talk about Race (Boston: Beacon, 2018). As we drift into fascism and fret about the
possibility of already being actors in the Cold War of Cyberspaces, we need to
be brutal as we analyze what the identity of democracy is not from the
vantage of the cold mind. Those of us
who need a crutch to be brutal can resort to reading the blogspot
"Methodical Insanity" ---
https://methodicalinsanity.wordpress.com
We need to
consider how the mendacity of hope divides and unites citizens in a republic
that pretends to be a democracy. It is liberating to remember, is it not, upon whose land we squat.
In
her review of Bloom [("Undemocratic Vistas. "New York Review of Books (November 5, 1987): 20-26.], Martha
Nussbaum took him to task for writing in "unqualified universals"
(21) and for distancing himself from ethical and social concerns beyond the
cloister of a narrow elite (24) and for thinking, apparently, that history would undermine "the realization that the greatest
truths are timeless" (26). Fukuyama qualifies his universals. He is not overtly elitist. He gives due attention to history. Thus, he projects himself to be as much the
champion of liberal democracy as Bloom was its antagonist.
The cold mind does not have to take Fukuyama
to task for the social science fiction he inscribes in his book, or in the beginning and ending sentences of a
single paragraph pertaining to what is to be done. The paragraph begins with "Our present world is simultaneously moving
toward the opposing dystopias of hypercentralization and endless fragmentation"
and ends with "Social media and the
internet have facilitated the emergence
of self-contained communities, walled off not by physical barriers but by
belief in shared identity" (182). At this point it is necessary for the
cold mind to remember that Fukuyama was once associated with RAND, an enterprise to connect military planning
with research, development, and policy decisions in the service of the state,
the sovereignty which calls the shots,
and that he is yet serving the interests of statist ideology in a new key. The cold mind congratulates Fukuyama for
bravely hinting that a politics of resentment is a valuable tool for
maintaining dignity and for giving delusions about the identity of democracy
the burial they deserve.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. December 15, 2018
Comments
Post a Comment