Ramcat Reads #18
Ramcat Reads #18
Alexander, Patrick
Elliot. From Slave Ship to Supermax:
Mass Incarceration, Prisoner Abuse, and the New Neo-Slave Novel. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2018. Although Alexander does not reference Abdul R.
JanMohamed's The Death-Bound-Subject
(2005), his book continues in a new key what JanMohamed addressed regarding the formation of black subjectivity. His readings of the carceral aesthetic in
works by Baldwin, Morrison, Charles Johnson, and Gaines are path-breaking
examinations of what Sheila Smith McKoy calls "a continuum of
state-sanctioned control over the black body." This book may inspire us to take up the
challenge Dominique DuBois Gilliard leaves us with in Rethinking Incarceration: Advocating for Justice That Restores (
Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2018) ---the challenge of "setting
the captives free, spiritually liberating them and emancipating them from a
depraved system that defaces the imago Dei" (199).
George C. Cochran
Innocence Project. Levon and Kennedy: Mississippi Innocence
Project. Brooklyn, NY: PowerHouse
Books, 2018. [Photographs by Isabelle Armand; text by Tucker Carrington]
A photographic documentary, reminiscent of WPA
books, based on Tucker Carrington's
article "Mississippi Innocence: The Convictions and Exonerations of Levon
Brooks and Kennedy Brewer and the Failure of the American Promise," Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics
28.12( 2015 )and pictures Armand created of the Brooks and Brewer families
because "within rural communities vulnerable to silence and oblivion, they stand witness
to wrongful conviction and mass incarceration" (back matter, n.p.). The book is a tidbit of visual/textual
evidence that much we need to know does
not occur in the urban public sphere.
Morrison, Toni. The
Origin of Others. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press, 2017.
Morrison's publishing her 1990 William E. Massey Sr.
Lectures in the History of Civilization as
Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary
Imagination (1992) was an event,
a moment of gravity in discussions of how a considerable amount of
"white" literature masked as
American literature dealt with or sought to avoid dealing with
Africanist presence in the United States of America. Her analyses were razor-sharp, surgical. They modeled qualities of literary critical
thinking one wished to absorb and pass on to one's undergraduate and graduate
students. If one could succeed, to some
degree, in transmitting Morrison's insights, one helped students ( as well as
oneself) to be more securely grounded in what mattered about history and the
need to have more thorough
understandings of literature as expressions of ideology and politics. The book was a positive disruption of
American literary arrogance.
By contrast, The
Origin of Others (2017), the Spring 2016 Charles Eliot Norton Lectures is an occasion, a mellowed recycling of
some main ideas from Playing in the Dark
in order to focus on the universal actuality and too often debilitating
consequences of cultural, social, and political expressions and uses of
difference, the multiple constructions of the vexed Other of which one's Self
is inevitably a part. Coming twenty-six years after the Massey lectures, the Norton
lectures are less surgical and hefty, less effective in dealing with the vexed
actuality of now. To be fair, we must
admit that The Origin of Others
provides crucial insights about Morrison's evolution as a writer and the
current status of her ability to critique forms of denial in twenty-first
century global rule of madness. The book
positions us to assess and re-assess the enormous contribution Morrison has
made to world literature, but it leaves us with the frustrating recognition
that historical meditations on race and difference may produce limited
enlightenment without any benefit of
redress and resolution. Stress
"enormous" by way of
remembering that Morrison was instrumental , before she was acknowledged as a
maker of world-class fiction, in assisting a few black writers to be published
in the mainstream The book is informed with self-commentary on
Morrison's achievements, and that commentary might be used with profit in
courses on literature and culture.
Morrison does succeed, however, in speaking with the wry charm
of the lower frequencies about
"the destabilizing pressures
and forces of the transglobal tread of
peoples"(109). In his foreword for The Origin of Others, Ta-nehisi
Coates commends Morrison for understanding "the hold that history
has on us all" and for providing "a welcome aid in grappling with how
that grip came to be"( xvii). I
stand in polar opposition to Coates about welcoming such aid, because there is
better aid to be had from ice cold discourses on the Others, discourses more
akin to the work of Frantz Fanon.
Playing in the Dark gave us radical
dreams of agency; The Origin of Others
leaves us with despair, with visions of how amoral gods kill us and all the
Others for sport. We rue the day of passing
on this wisdom to future generations.
Perry, Imani. May We
Forever Stand: A History of the Black National Anthem. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina
Press, 2018. Perry's is a smart and
timely book about how James Weldon Johnson's poem/song has occupied expressive
cultural locations for 115 years. "The ways we tell history," Perry
asserts, "often make transitions from one period to the next seem
permanent and strict. But in truth every
moment and movement bleeds with the ink
of previous eras. This truth emerged
dramatically as I researched the history of 'Lift Every Voice and Sing.' It was
the epic anthem embraced by black institutions as well as black and multiracial
social movements" (xiv).
Roberts, Blain. Pageants,
Parlors and Pretty Women: Race and Beauty in the Twentieth-Century South.
Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2014. A good WORKS CITED
item for a future study of the making of "whiteness" and the making
of "white women" in the South.
The commentary on black women can be used in new assessments of Toni
Morrison's The Bluest Eye.
Ruffin, Maurice
Carlos. We Cast A Shadow. New
York: One World, 2019.
A novel scheduled to be published on January 29, 2019 by
PenguinRandom House may be an omen about what some of us may feel obligated to
do in remembering 1919 and the race riots that bloodied that year. I refer, of course, to We Cast A Shadow by Maurice Carlos Ruffin, a book for which I have
great expectations. My expectations
exceed those of the in-house promoters who guessed Ruffin's novel will appeal
to "fans of Get Out and Paul
Beatty's The Sellout." I would have been more pleased had the
promoters said the debut novel will appeal to serious readers of fiction who
have not allowed George Schuyler's Black No More (1931) and Wallace
Thurman's The Blacker the Berry
(1929) to hibernate in the dustbin of oblivion.
That would indeed have been a smart gesture of advertising and
contemporary American literary politics, a foil for the claim that Ruffin is
"writing in the tradition of Ralph Ellison and Franz Kafka." I believe that Ruffin is in the black-on-black-on-black tradition of transforming low satire
into praiseworthy art, a tradition commodious enough to embrace Ellison the
myth-maker and Kafka the parable-blacksmith and the fabulous trickery of
unnamed West African tellers of tales from back in the night.
Unlike a career-whipped critic who will wait for We Cast A Shadow to earn a major or
minor prize before she or he will offer a generous appreciation, I am secure if
I gamble in the casino of the unknown.
As I mentioned some weeks ago to a friend, I believe Ruffin like the
poet Clint Smith, the photographer L. Kasimu Harris, and the playwright Harold E. Clark belongs to
a new wave of writers and artists from
New Orleans who have class, who have mastered craft, and who just naturally
address our now-future society (not a near-future one) of, to quote from the
PenguinRandom House promotion, "resurgent racism, segregation, and
expanding private prisons." In the
Age of Trump, they are less surreal than "for- real," and they know how
the "tragic magic" of actuality manifests itself. Read Ruffin's novel to discover how long the
shadows of chaos might be.
Vargas, Jose
Antonio. Dear America: Notes of an Undocumented Citizen. New York: Dey St.,
2018.
"After 25 years of living illegally in a country
that does not consider me one of its own," Vargas admits, "this book
is the closest thing I have to freedom." A Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, Vargas who arrived from the
Philippines, reflects on what being homeless might mean for immigrants who defy
the American rule of law. His book is
yet another repeating of what we have long known about the psychological dimensions of liberty
and the United States as a democratic experiment.
Walker, Alice. Taking
the Arrow Out of the Heart: Poems. New York: 37INK/Atria, 2018.
When you are past sixty-five, the radicalism of your
youth may turn into regret . One advantage of age, however, is being able to
remember what were crucial issues in the USA fifty or more years ago. Of
course, you can tell convincing lies
about "the good old days." You
can prevaricate with gusto and count at the end of the day how many red
herrings you were able to sell. If those
who listen to you are very young and have not developed the skills needed to
segregate fact from fiction, they quite likely believe your tales are
true. They may be too preoccupied with
the troubles of now to fact-check your statements about a better time in
America's history. They are little aware that you are lying with a purpose in a
tradition that some writers cherish, a tradition quite easily co-opted and
imitated in sinister discourses. When societies and cultures hold literature
hostage, more harm than good may be the outcome.
Does an
instructive purpose justify a costumed lie? Perhaps. Fiction is often a free
space where emotional truths defy verification for the sake of moral or ethical
improvement, but a terrifying danger lurks in the fact of the lie. Fiction can
cross the psychological line of no
return and produce more harm than good.
Think of the demonic fictions
which sprawl out of control in the Age of Trump, leaving the fact of the lie
amorally nude in sunlight and moonlight.
There is something terrifying in moments when you choose to be severely honest,
whether you are old or young : the "what was then" is a replication
of the "what is now." Fiction
morphs into the nonfiction of the changing same! Stop lying to yourself.
The present is a
stage for division and national trauma
--- the cancers of hate and self-hatred thrive daily; the moral compass is dysfunctional and incapable of giving proper directions to anyone or anything; natural and
man-made violence negates the smallest dreams of peace everywhere on our
planet; the rule of law is broken; "hope" is a vulgar word; nostalgia
for the past is a terminal illness, and yearning for a future is too often an
obscene exercise. You laugh to keep from
dying not from crying.
Rereading The Third
Life of Grange Copeland and The
Bluest Eye, first novels published in 1970, with fellow senior citizens
engenders unsettling recognitions about how very bad and prophetic the
"good old days" inadvertently were and continue to be. What you dismissed, condemned, or minimized
in the name of racial and ethnic solidarity when you read these novels back in
the day now haunts you. How
sublimely myopic you were. Yes, you were
and are complicit, no matter how much
you try to deny the horror of truth, with the production of "now."
Time ensures that you can find no sanctuary in dreams, in hopes incarcerated in
promises.
These novels
bludgeon you as you attend more passionately in your old age to their narrative
strategies; they are whetstones for
cognition. You find yourself not speaking truth
to power but speaking the most painful truth
about power, articulating the unending warfare of cosmic evil and will
power. Unless you are brain-dead, the unsettling recognitions empower you to
discard nostalgia, to modify your terms of engagement with this world, to
fight, and to send the lies about the better days that never were to a gas chamber of oblivion. What happens
rather slowly in reading Walker's
fiction can happen more quickly in reading her poems which transmit her
political aesthetic with great clarity.
One senior citizen reader insisted our group should read
Alice Walker's poem "When the President of the United States Calls a Black
Woman a Dog" and then follow-up by reading all the poems in Taking the Arrow Out of the Heart (which has Manuel Garcia Verdecia's Spanish
translation of each poem). Walker's first novel had opened a window, maybe torn
down a whole wall, for her. She wanted
us to have an epiphany similar to Verdecia's as he engaged in "a marvelous
adventure of personal growth. Translating her works has turned into a fantastic
literary, human, and spiritual experience (xxiii) una maravillosa aventura de
crecimiento personal. Traducir sus obras
se ha vuelto una estupenda ecperiencia literaria, humana y espiritual"
(xxv), but we have that experience in the complex simplicity of Walker's
English. And that experience etches in
our minds that speaking truth about power does not lie.
Yang, Wesley. The
Souls of Yellow Folk: Essays. New York: W. W. Norton, 2018.
"Asian-American success," according to Yang, "is typically taken
to ratify the American Dream and to prove that minorities can make it in this
country without handouts" (31). Yang
takes down a few idols of the American tribes, but he does not penetrate or
expose the souls of yellow folk as successfully as W. E. B. DuBois anatomized
the souls of black ones. Indeed, Yang
gives some unfortunate credibility to an idea circulated in the March 2018
issue of Asian American Journal of
Psychology: Asian Americans rarely disclose "their true emotional and
social selves" in a public space.
Are the majority of Asian-Americans
waiting for a magic green light to cross the street and become
thoroughly American ?
Comments
Post a Comment