The stupidity of absolute belief
THE STUPIDITY OF
ABSOLUTE BELIEF
The stupidity of absolute belief is an opiate that
undermines the power of critical thought.
It is better to err in excessive disbelief than to be numbed by faith,
an example of belief taken to extremes.
While the irrationality of faith is innocent enough in matters of
religion and spirituality, it is diabolical in matters of American political
life in 2018. This hypothesis, of course,
must be tested by gathering of empirical
evidence. Otherwise, a person marinates
in bad faith.
As I waited for a conversation between Representative
Cedric Richmond and Senator Elizabeth Warren to begin at Dillard University on
August 3, I read several chapters of Chaim Perelman's The Realm of Rhetoric (Notre
Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1982).
His philosophical arguments about rhetoric could possibly put iron in my
resolve to avoid being deceived by talk, however progressive the chatter might
be. Warren and Richmond were obligated
to appeal to people who attended Netroots Nations 2018 conference in New
Orleans ; thus, they had to justify their loyalty to the status quo of the Democratic Establishment, to persuade me and
other doubters that they were not faking solidarity with people who might
question whether their talk about saving democracy is more than charming hot
air. Remember they were in a city that must deal each day with bad air from the
funky butt of the Establishment. It is necessary to know what the limits of rhetoric
are.
Warren and Richmond are skilled orators. Listening to them live was certainly more
satisfying than just listening to stylized sound bites from television. The blood and flesh presence of politicians
who are most often images on a screen counts for something. Warren was on Richmond's turf, and I admit
she talked about the right issues with appropriate energy. She was forthcoming in saying, for example,
that the American criminal justice system is racist, that unions are necessary,
that China invests more in dealing with
infrastructure than does the USA, that
the rich and powerful are the domestic "enemies of the people" who
exploit the poor and the declining middle class, that our educational systems
are broken, that health care and Social Security are at risk, that the America
that enabled her to become a senator is vastly different from the America that
accommodates the circus promoted by the PLOTUSA , his amoral/immoral friends,
and his death-oriented base. Despite her
obligation to produce a "feel good moment," Warren did demonstrate a
modicum of sincerity that Richmond orchestrated with dignity. I did feel she was sincere in saying the
American people must fight and vote to resume control of shaping what democracy
will be in a future.
What did not make me feel good about the conversation was
the failure of Richmond and Warren to step outside the box of the black/white
binary and to demonstrate depth of knowing what a complex, changing world order actually includes.
Perhaps in due time before the mid-term elections on November 6, 2018 they will
do so. Perhaps. Let us be cautious about
placing bets on "perhaps." But until the time arrives when Congressional
talk is identical with Congressional action (if such time can arrive), the stupidity of absolute belief prevails
and endures.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. August 4, 2018
Comments
Post a Comment