The White Hole of American Education
THE
WHITE HOLE OF AMERICAN EDUCATION
Were some American humanists as clever as they
pretend to be, they would minimize their chanting about
the crisis of crisis, begin "theorizing" what is METHS
OR THEMS, and devote 70% of their annual conventions to
formulating praxis which can be
transformed into commendable and fund-worthy pedagogy. No one has to pity
the victim when the victim (in this case
the lamenting humanist) has created necessary and sufficient conditions for
blame. Endless white lies about beauty
and truth may generate decent poetry and a splinter of morality, but they have
severely limited value in efforts to
lessen the barbarous acts, which in the language of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights (1948), erode "the inalienable rights to which all human
beings regardless of race, colour, religion, sex, language, political or other
opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status are inherently
entitled to as human beings; the white lies of the humanities may assist in
imagining calamities of Nature, but they are of questionable utility in
producing operative strategies and tactics essential in managing calamities.
Contrary to drylongso beliefs, the stale arguments in support of the humanities
as we know them may authorize tragedy.
American
education at every level is currently having an affair with Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM). We need to question the wisdom
of dismissing the humanities simply on the grounds of pragmatism, but we need
to admit also that adding either Medicine or Humanities or both to STEM is a
viable option. It is a waste of energy to sing sorrow songs for the humanities
when we should lift our voices in support of actual interdisciplinarity. Our scientists and humanists would do well to
listen together to talk about what is
profitable in a future embrace of Mathematics, Engineering, Technology, Humanities
and Science (METHS). The arguments Vera
Tobin has made on behalf of cognition and narrative and those proposed by Rita
Charon regarding narrative competence and medicine have genuine merit. Review
those arguments through the lens of Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed.
We need robust discussions of what a new praxis and pedagogy for the
21st century might be and collaborations between humanists and scientists that
transform ideas into actions. We need to drill the rot out of the white hole of
American education and fill the cavity with praiseworthy and fund-worthy
intelligence.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. July 9, 2018
Comments
Post a Comment