The Trojan Horse Is Very White
THE TROJAN HORSE IS
VERY WHITE
The Trojan horse
is very white
when Cassandra
sings,
and the Tribe of
Trump sweats
to clip your
intellectual wings.
You may regret, sooner rather than later, the deadly
effects and affects of so-called news, the flooding of our minds with
spectacles, conservative and liberal cursing, and a spectrum of pure
nonsense. Do not say I did not warn you
if you awake in what you believed was the bed of democracy only to discover you
have been sleeping in the cage of fascism.
The signs are clear, but you must know how to read and how to read
critically.
Do not dismiss Kathryn Paige Harden's New York Times op-ed "Why
Progressives Should Embrace the Genetics of Education"
(https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/24/opinion/dna-nature-education.html). Harden, an associate professor of psychology
at the University of Texas-Austin, may be a Cassandra despite herself, a
Cassandra speaking in tongues. Consider
her pause-inspiring conclusion:
"Genetic differences in human life are a scientific
fact, like climate change. Many
progressives resist acknowledging this when it comes to education, fearing that
it will compromise their egalitarian beliefs. But just like acknowledging the
reality of climate change is necessary to ensure a sustainably habitable planet,
acknowledging the reality of genetic differences between people is a necessary
step for us to ensure a more just society." Have we just read an example of how
Trump-rhetoric, disguised as neutral or bias-free discourse, packages bad
science in nicely executed social science prose? Does the word "ensure"
mask the word "enforce"? Is a blurred fallacy present in equating the
subject of climate change with the subject of genetic differences? Who are progressives? Who are regressives? Is "egalitarian" a vulgar, micro
aggressive word? What is SNP (single nucleotide polymorphisms)? How is it used by SSGAC (Social Science
Genetic Association Consortium)? Can
research on a population of 1.1 million
individuals be replicated in identical research on a different population of
1.1 million people and yield the same information about gene discovery and
polygenic prediction? We ought to put
the feet of science in its own fire!
Do not dismiss Professor Harden. Ask instead whether through an invisible
gesture she rejects Karl Marx in order to better embrace Leo Strauss. Harden makes a cloaked reference to the
report "Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide
association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals from Nature Genetics (July 23, 2018
------https://doi.org/10.1038/541588-018-0147-3 ), a report that provokes
interest in the resurrection of eugenics and Social Darwinism in 2018. Don't
panic. Connect dots. You may see a global graph, which for all we
don't know, may be posted on the walls of the U.S. Department of
Education. Don't panic. Just bring social science and science to
justice in the blacksmith shop of Esu Elegbara Aeschylus. Walk in the light of T'ai Chi. A sufficiently beautiful mind acknowledges where the epic
narrative Sunjata is coming from and
where the tragic drama of the Oresteia is
going.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. July 29, 2018
Comments
Post a Comment