joy of scholarship
The Joy of
Scholarship
It is good that finding joy in scholarship can provide
respite from the depression that national insecurity, the death-bound antics of
Trump and his tribe, the drift from democracy into neo-fascism, and a surplus of natural disasters (the
revenge of Nature) bring into our daily lives. I have begun to work on a book
to be titled Richard Wright: The Unending
Hunger for Life. I need to identify
and assess recent commentary on Wright's legacy being produced by non-academic
and academic readers. Curiosity told me
to check on what is being said about Wright and Leon Trotsky. I had the
"good fortune" of discovering Adrian Chan-Wyles' article
"Richard Wright: Black Empowerment and the Delirium of Trotskyism" on
a Buddhist-Marxism Alliance (UK) site.
The article inspires cautious skepticism.
Adrian Chan-Wyles is a writer, translator, founder of the
Sangha Kommune, and Spiritual Director of the Chan Buddhism Institute. The Kommune is a Marxist-Leninist (Maoist) platform
for exposing bourgeois lies and Trotskyist deception, and Chan-Wyles uses it
with panache to broadcast his disdain for capitalism. Whether he is also
broadcasting a truth is open to ideological debate. He has a degree of respect for Wright as an
African American thinker, but he can't stomach Wright's failure to share (and
thus affirm) his alleged hatred of capitalism as an oppressive economic
phenomenon. Prior to reading Cornel
West's introduction for Black Power
(2008), the omnibus edition of Black
Power, The Color Curtain, and White Man, Listen!,
Chan-Wyles had never heard of Wright.
Using the magic which sprouts
when some critics of culture(s) suddenly "discover" Wright, he
authorizes himself to have "the distinct impression" from sampling Black Power," that if capitalism
wasn't racist, then most Black people would have no problem with it (despite
being its mass victims during the era of trans-Atlantic institutional
slavery)." More disturbing is his
tortured effort to whitewash Soviet Communism and Chinese Communism in making a
case, without sufficient evidence, that Wright was permanently infected by Trotskyism. I would argue that Wright's vernacular
existentialism was sufficient to keep a safe distance between Trotsky and himself. After
sampling a few examples of Chan-Wyles' writing on the internet, I return the
favor of his audacity by authorizing my impression that he speaks with a
forking Chinese-Irish tongue. Two can play the presumptive game in the 21st
century.
Chan-Wyles has the decency to specify that he is
criticizing Wright's opinion that capitalism can be reformed from within rather
than conducting an ad hominem
attack. I shall be genteel enough, in
turn, to say I am strictly criticizing his failure to learn one of the most
valuable lessons Wright tried to teach: one
must be on top of theory not under it.
Were Chan-Wyles to think a bit more deeply about how
Marxist-Leninist-Maoist theory has ordained a most excellent and thriving communist capitalism in mainland
China, he might hesitate to suggest that Wright was complicit with Trotsky in
harboring anti-China sentiments. I
suspect he could then be more Buddhist in
understanding that Wright and many of his peers ultimately rejected the delusions and delirious claims of "isms."
They may have been blinded by the will
to freedom, but their humanism was not predicated on the akineanna
(nothingness) and the sunnattas (emptiness) of theory.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. July 21, 2018
Comments
Post a Comment