On Presentism
ON PRESENTISM
Wai Chee Dimock's editor's column on "Historicism,
Presentism, Futurism" (PMLA 133.2 (2018): 257-263) may have
strong impact, minimal impact, or no impact at all upon the thinking of MLA
members and others about the utility of humanistic inquiry. Nevertheless, the column reminds us of how
dangerous it is to assume that 21st century scholars share common knowledge, or
even value it, in the everyday practices of their lives and work. If the Modern Language Association is most
representative of what obtains in the sites of PWIs, it is reasonable to note
that MLA and those sites possess a mere sliver of cultural literacy regarding what has
characterized learning, teaching, and production of knowledge at HBCUs since
their emergence in the nineteenth century.
It is matter of fact, which can
be validated by research, that praxis at HBCUs values "situated
pedagogy" more deeply than do privileged PWIs. To some degree, what Dimock
might think is relatively new and exciting about presentism is an ancient and
suspect topic at HBCUs. The luxury of trivializing
history as temporal process is possible but deemed repulsive at predominantly
African American institutions of higher education.
During my undergraduate years at Tougaloo College (1960-64),
I did not embrace presentism as " a fallacy that deforms the past in our
own image" ( 257). And during my
teaching career at Tougaloo and Dillard University (1970-2012), I stressed to
my students that they should cultivate awareness of being makers of history
rather than objects of history. My
graduate experiences at Illinois Institute of Technology, the State University
of New York at Albany, and the University of Virginia were peppered with a
surplus of enactments of presentism and warnings about the bad faith Karl
Popper criticized in The Poverty of Historicism
(1957). My more recent contention that I
am pre-future and always politically incorrect has armed me against the
dreadful assaults of historicism, presentism, and the fantasy extremes of
futurism. Being armed, however, doesn't
endow one with total immunity. I could make
a fatal slip in one direction or another.
A single idea in Dimock's informative column is the source
of my discontent, namely the suggestion that African American Studies is a
likely candidate for experiments "with some form of strategic presentism"
(261). Dimock notes that African
American Studies is "increasingly anchored by Afrofuturism in its
recuperative and reparative engagement with slavery, a past whose afterlives
are everywhere observable" and that "Afrofuturism has been at the
center of an explosive scholarly conversation. In popular culture ---in music,
art, and film…----this not-yet-realized future mediates past and present by
making headline news…, a force in the here and now rivaled only by
Shakespeare" (261). Mein Gott. It is my personal belief
(which may be isolated from what anyone else in the world believes) that
African American Studies is foremost a tool for relentless analysis of life and
death matters, a tool evolved from the pioneering thinking of David Walker
regarding "situatedness." If
it is so easily co-opted and transformed into an academic toy, I feel obligated
to intensify my use of terms of engagement as weapons in the combat zones where
disabling "knowledge" is being forged by the humanist inquiry of my
enemies of various colors and ideologies.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. June 21, 2018
Comments
Post a Comment