fit despair into the day
FIT DESPAIR INTO THE DAY
Morrison, Toni. The Origin of Others. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017.
Morrison's publishing her 1990 William E. Massey Sr.
Lectures in the History of Civilization as
Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary
Imagination (1992) was an event,
a moment of gravity in discussions of how a considerable amount of
"white" literature masked as American literature dealt with or sought to
avoid dealing with Africanist presence in the United States of America. Her analyses were razor-sharp, surgical. They modeled qualities of literary critical
thinking one wished to absorb and pass on to one's undergraduate and graduate
students. If one could succeed, to some
degree, in transmitting Morrison's insights, one helped students ( as well as
oneself) to be more securely grounded in what mattered about history and the
need to have more thorough understandings
of literature as expressions of ideology and politics. The book was a positive disruption of American
literary arrogance.
By contrast, The
Origin of Others (2017), the Spring 2016 Charles Eliot Norton Lectures is an occasion, a mellowed recycling of
some main ideas from Playing in the Dark
in order to focus on the universal actuality and too often debilitating
consequences of cultural, social, and political expressions and uses of
difference, the multiple constructions of the vexed Other of which one's Self
is inevitably a part. Coming twenty-six years after the Massey lectures, the
Norton lectures are less surgical and hefty, less effective in dealing with the
vexed actuality of now. To be fair, we
must admit that The Origin of Others
provides crucial insights about Morrison's evolution as a writer and the
current status of her ability to critique forms of denial in twenty-first
century global rule of madness. The book
positions us to assess and re-assess the enormous contribution Morrison has
made to world literature, but it leaves us with the frustrating recognition
that historical meditations on race and difference may produce limited
enlightenment without any benefit of
redress and resolution. The book is
informed with self-commentary on Morrison's achievements, and that commentary
might be used with profit in courses on literature and culture.
Morrison does succeed, however, in speaking with the wry charm of the
lower frequencies about "the destabilizing pressures and forces of the transglobal tread of peoples"(109). In his foreword for The Origin of Others, Ta-nehisi
Coates commends Morrison for understanding "the hold that history
has on us all" and for providing "a welcome aid in grappling with how
that grip came to be"( xvii). I
stand in polar opposition to Coates about welcoming such aid, because there is
better aid to be had from ice cold discourses on the Others, discourses more
akin to the work of Frantz Fanon.
Playing in the Dark gave us radical dreams
of agency; The Origin of Others
leaves us with despair, with visions of how amoral gods kill us and all the
Others for sport. It is doubtful that we
can muster any alacrity to pass on this negative wisdom to future generations.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. September 23, 2017
Comments
Post a Comment