Red flags
Red Flags of Accountability
VOTE
Two words we may use frequently before and after the
October 14, 2017 elections in New Orleans are
accountable
and accountability. Simple definitions from Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary ---
accountable--adj.
1. subject to giving an account: answerable.
2. capable of being accounted for: explainable. Syn see responsible
accountability --n.
The definitions in Black's
Law Dictionary are likewise blunt----
accountability. State of being responsible or answerable. See
also Liability.
accountable. Subject to pay; responsible; liable.
It is reasonable to demand that candidates be accountable
and to question whether there is sufficient accountability in the Sewerage and
Water Board of New Orleans and the Orleans Parish School Board. It is fairly
transparent what we are doing when we demand something; when we raise a
question, it is not exactly clear whether we are requesting information or
sending forth a nicely concealed accusation.
What we may believe is reasonable in our speech acts may be heard and
interpreted as hostile in the arena of politics. The potential clash between those who have
nominal power and those of us who know we do not have power can be serious.
Such a clash occurred during the August 8 town hall on
education reforms since Katrina sponsored by the New Orleans Association of
Black Journalists at Xavier University. It wasn't something planned for the
edification or entertainment of visiting journalists. It just happened in the same way that Topsy just grew.
The history of politics in New Orleans teaches us to be on guard about
what means what, about how truth is always beyond our grasp.
The town hall began with a brief conversation between
Michelle Miller-Morial and Dr. Adrienne Dixson, associate professor of Critical
Race Theory and Education at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. The
conversation focused on the national educational landscape and the ascent of
charter schools. Dr. Dixson noted the
ascent is related to neoliberal ideology, to belief that the private sector can
and should have more power in shaping a future for education than Federal
agencies, particularly the U. S. Department of Education. She also noted that her research or mapping
of the landscape in Louisiana and New Orleans is constrained by a legal cap on
full disclosure ( limited availability of data) about student performance. Thus, her account or narrative of the
landscape cannot represent full accountability for something that is funded not
with private money but taxpayer dollars. And the charter school boards, under
the color of privacy, can legally opt
not to account for some things to the taxpayers who finance their enterprises.
There is the rub which became the wound as the town hall
moved forward.
VOTE AND WATCH RED
FLAGS
The wound opened as certain remarks were made by
panelists who gave mini-state-of-the-schools reports under Norman Robinson's
moderation. Dr. Henderson Lewis, Jr.,
Orleans Parish School Board Superintendent, suggested the school unification plan, which goes into
effect on July 1, 2018, can probably bring a sense of normality to education in
New Orleans. We can have a better
dialogue. Mr. Jamar McKneely, CEO of
InspireNOLA Charter Schools, was visually and verbally rattled that citizens
who aren't enthralled with charter schools do not attend enough to deeply
rooted, interconnected problems of education, job prospects, and poverty. He came across as a champion of neoliberalism
as it was defined by Dr. Dixson.
Having visited the OPSB website---http://opsb.us/schools and having read the draft unification plan, I had
the word "accountable" in my mind as I listened. O.K.
Citizens in New Orleans did have
choice and input in shaping a plan that has been legitimized by Governor
Edwards's signing of Senate Bill 432 into law as Act 91. A friend reminded me that input without power
is a fairly empty political gesture. And Mr. McKneely was politically correct
in not reminding the audience that the plan provides a loophole for schools in
the "School Board Chartering Authority" section of the plan. "
Quote ---
1. Autonomy ---Each charter school shall have complete
autonomy over all areas of school operation as set forth in each school's
Operating Agreement, as long as such operations are in compliance with all
federal, state, and municipal laws and regulations.
Unquote---
Autonomy includes school programming, yearly calendars,
hiring and firing, and budgeting among other things. But do we have any federal, state, and
municipal laws that mandate a charter school's being held accountable for instances of class- and race-based inequity in New
Orleans?
Autonomy can
function as a firewall against questions about the displacement of education as
critical learning with certification as successful performance on tests. All charter schools are not equal. Some do educate students; others certify
students as candidates for dead-end menial labor. Do any of them believe a mixture of
traditional academic education and vocational/technical training (non-academic
skill sets) should be an option for students who have talents that charter
schools are ill-prepared to test? As a
friend urged me to do after the town hall event, check the reports on strengths and weakness of
"progress" in the landscape at http://www.CheckStatePlans.org .
As far as I am concerned, red flags flap noisily in the
educational landscape of the Crescent City and send weird signals about who is accountable to whom for what and remind
us that accountability is a terrible
thing to waste. And normality is as likely to return to the new New Orleans as
terrorism is likely to vanish from this planet. I would really like to know
what members of the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) will write
about the post-Katrina educational landscape in our city, to know if any of
them saw the red flags of accountability.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. August 9, 2017
Comments
Post a Comment