Character
Kalamu ya Salaam's
Questions Regarding American Character
Questions: The fundamental issue is simply: can we, as
human beings, control ourselves; specifically, can we Americans control
ourselves? Is violence so deeply and
indelibly enmeshed into our character that there is no hope of our society
existing without egregious acts of social violence against ourselves and
others? Can we control ourselves? Can anyone or any force control us? Thus far, our government has not [done] so, nor has our religion. Is there any solution or must we perforce of
the American character just have to learn to live with and tolerate violence?
From Salaam's
email ("some quick thoughts on violence") to Jerry Ward, dated
8/13/2017
Responses when
answers do not suffice: An
unorthodox belief drives my responses: the human animal is fundamentally evil
and violent but endowed, by virtue of " relatively free will" with
remarkable potential to be fundamentally good and peaceful.
The human animal
has left evidence in multiple forms of its predisposition to worship evil and its reluctance to manifest goodness. The veracity of my belief is neither absolute
nor immune to doubts; it swims against the tide of speculations. It depends on a mission impossible for a
single human mind ----the gathering of a bazillion historical examples to make
the case that from the emergence of homo sapiens on the African continent to
2017, the evolving of the human animal
(i.e., its physical and cognitive changes in biology and cultures) pits the
essential power of evil and hatred against the relative power to manifest
goodness and love. Manichaean vision is
Manichaean vision is Manichaean vision.
My belief prevents
answering Salaam's questions. It doesn't, however, preclude responding
to them. Uncertainty is an option but
not the only one.
R#1: Human beings
cannot control themselves. Americans
cannot control themselves.
R#2: Before the
15th century in a Western configuration of time, there was no American
character. American character is an offspring of the continual and continuous
violent, capitalist raping of indigenous space, the so-called Western
Hemisphere. The child is the invention of theft, dispersing of European
diseases, genocide, racism and colonization, unchained greed and accidents,
tainted religiosity and unregenerate hypocrisy.
R#3: Hidden
dimensions of how Salaam uses the word "character" expose themselves
in readings of the foreword of Constance Rourke's American Humor: A Study of the National Character (1931) and of the
definition of character offered by the Cambridge
Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd edition, 1999:
character, the
comprehensive set of ethical and intellectual dispositions if a person. Intellectual virtues ---like carefulness in
the evaluation of evidence --- promote, for one, the practice of seeking
truth. Moral or ethical virtues ---
including traits like courage and generosity ---dispose persons not only to
choices and actions abut also to attitudes and emotions. Such dispositions are generally considered
relatively stable and responsive to reason. (130)
R#4: As Rourke and Salaam use the word, character is an abstraction, a metaphor
of another metaphor named the body
politic. The metaphors are drenched
with humorous and non-humorous violence.
R#5: Nature as chaos rather than as the proof of natural
law is the force that can control us.
R#6: There is no solution to or resolution of the
implacable violence of American character.
A few of us are existentially condemned to detest it and to do battle
with it minute by agonizing minute.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. August 27, 2017
Comments
Post a Comment