a brief manifesto


Death of the Post-colonial/Birth of the Post-Responsible



                The Swedish scholar Stefan Helgesson makes a timely intervention in a recent issue of PMLA.  His comments  in "Post-anticolonialism" (PMLA 132.2 (2017): 164-170) is quite what is needed to characterize  our global swamp of academic pretensions in the face of palpable human suffering.  We all pretend.  We  might ask the question "Why Write?" in our time and location for reasons akin to Jean-Paul Sartre's asking Qu'est-ce que la littérature  in the twentieth century. And we need to answer our question with reference to the impossibility of our totally rejecting  joy, pain, and thinking. Even if we contend it is possible (and ,for whatever reason, desirable) for a human being to be not-human, to be a thing, a machine, a linguistic sign or a figment of another's imagining,  common sense and empirical evidence  confirm  that death is the only absolute termination of a person's humanity. Figural death matters equally with literal birth.



                One sentence in Helgesson's article appealed strongly to my sense of how humanity has been cheapened in academic writing and work.



"Transferred to our times, the Third Space should rightly be seen as a crucial conceptual resource for articulating what we may call a procedural alternative to the politics of hatred and confrontation mounting on the Internet and perpetrated politically by the likes of Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and the Islamic State." (166)



Helgesson refers to the concept of Third Space discussed in Homi Bhabha's The Location of Culture (1994), considering that, in light of the histories of the 1990s, Bhabha's idea about "negotiation and transformation, was…not an abstract idea but a lived political reality" (166).  It might be added that Third Space offers an alternative to the politics of denial and cognitive dissonance, but provides no relief from the implacable germination of individual and collective terrorisms on our planet. Close reading and use of critical thinking skills in multiple interactive environments do little to ensure that we can avoid cheapening.  We must be forthright in so instructing our students.  Blessed are those of us who are not driven mad by the condition of being human, who resort to African indigenous knowing and the dao of the East that is trivialized by contemporary Enlightenment projects in the West.  We welcome the death of the post-colonial and shudder at the birth of the post-responsible.



                Growing evidence that colonialism in the pursuit of capitalism is ascending in 2017 diminishes the utility of post-colonial theory as such, and we can give the theory a decent burial.  Growing evidence that in higher education and other sectors of life what we once upon a time called "responsibility" is being swiftly demonized does authorize us to acknowledge the universality of post-responsible thought.  We do not have to like it, but we damned sure better not deny that it exists.  Strange forms of irresponsibility are being born as climate change moves forward.



                Another timely intervention enables me to close the circle of the absurd.  André Carrington's essay "Mike Brown's Body: New Materialism and Black Form." ASAP/Journal 2.2 (May 2017): 276-283 is refreshingly quare.  More quare than queer in speaking to gravity.  In his commentary on what is fast, furious, and loose in academic discourses, Carrington mentions the importance of Charles Mills's unironic essay on white ignorance, on an "epistemology of ignorance" in Sullivan, Shannon and Nancy Tuana,eds. Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007. At last, ignorance is bliss.  Carrington's final sentence appeals strongly to my sense of what is at risk among human beings and in their studies of literatures and cultures.



"In deference to the complications introduced to feminist, queer, and new materialist critiques…I do not want my relationship with the human to end just yet.  The body is still warm." (282).  Ashe. I concur from the pre-future angle of responsibility.



Jerry W. Ward, Jr.            August 6, 2017








Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Christmas, Kwanzaa, 2018

Blog 12.19.2017 CHRISTMAS I have a reason for not being anxious to celebrate Advent and Christmas Day.   Sixty years ago, my father died on December 25.   Fifty-nine years ago, my favorite uncle died a few days before Christmas.   I do want other people to be happy, but I am most at peace when Christmas has gone with the snow, the sunshine or rain, the wind.   I still say "Merry Christmas."   The only genuine happiness I experience, however, is listening to Handel's "The Messiah" and a few songs I've treasured since childhood,   attending Midnight Mass, having home-made fruitcake   after Mass, and eating a special meal with relatives on the excessively commercialized holiday. KWANZAA Umoja ---Decide with whom you should seek unity. Kujichagulia --Expand the terms of engagement for 2018. Ujima ---Cooperate on a project with people you can trust. Ujamaa --Be frugal.   Shop selectively. Nia ---Remember ou...
Read more

implacable violence, part one

Implacable Violence, Part One The death of Senator John McCain quickens our   interest in how to deal with contemporary   narratives of life history.   McCain's touchstone story pertains to American conservative values, the consequences of trauma,   military and public service, violence, and   a sense of honor.   Barack Obama's differently remarkable narratives direct attention to the absence of military service, class and caste violence, the audacity of hope, centralist values, and diversity in the history of "race."   Narratives about McCain and Obama stand in noteworthy contrast to future narratives about Donald Trump, stories that may place ego in the foreground as they unfold tales of sexism, constipated values,     inadvertent racism, the violence of capitalism, sleight of mouth, and avoidance of military service.   Ego, self-fashioning, and boldness are apparent in the three sets of narrative, but excess lynches the Trump set...
Read more

DuBois and Black Reconstruction

  PROPAGATION OF HISTORY AND FAITH   DuBois, W. E. B.   Black Reconstruction in America 1860-1880 . (1935; New York: The Free Press, 1998).   Dr. DuBois knew what was problematic about his revisionist history in Black Reconstruction .   He made his intentions clear in his note "To The Reader" (December 1934).   His ideal audience consisted of people who believed a black person in America "and in general is an average and ordinary human being, who under given environment develops like other human beings…"   DuBois was not trying to convince those who regarded " the Negro as a distinctly inferior creation, who can never successfully take part in modern civilization…"   Indeed, the Negro, in my mind at least, is the chief architect of civilization.   Is it only a matter of accident that Carter G. Woodson's The Mis-Education of the Negro was published   two years before Black Reconstruction ?   No.   It wasn't an accide...
Read more