The NOPD Consent Decree
Charbonnet and the NOPD Consent Decree
One of the most
serious of the 18 candidates for mayor, Judge Desiree Charbonnet (Ret.)
issued a "Comprehensive Crime Plan" on July 17, 2017. By doing so, Charbonnet sent a serious
message to citizens about the kind of mayor she would be if elected. There is much in her plan that would please
the FORWARD NEW ORLEANS coalition, especially regarding public safety as a
priority. The coalition argues that New
Orleans needs a "top-tier police superintendent." Charbonnet avoids the ambiguity of the
wording "top-tier" and suggests, in one immediate action item that we
need to "conduct a nationwide search for the best Police Chief…We must
have the best available Police Chief…and give her or him the latitude to run
the department without daily interference and micromanaging from the mayor's
office." Question: Is Michael S. Harrison, who has
headed NOPD since October 14, 2014, who has much experience with vice,
narcotics, gang enforcement, and criminal intelligence, and who in my mind is a
man of integrity, not the best available Police Chief? I invite Judge Charbonnet to provide an
answer.
There is much in Charbonnet's comprehensive crime plan
that is transparent and praiseworthy, particularly the five Rs (recruit,
reorganize, redeploy, retain, response) to make NOPD more effective. But one transparent suggestion is less
transparent than it seems at first glance.
Charbonnet want to make NOPD more effective without increasing taxes. Thus, she suggests that the city "seek
permission from the Federal Court to modify the NOPD Consent Decree in order to
reduce the amount of money paid by the city to monitor the provisions of the
consent decree. To be direct, the
monitor costs too much money, and the functions
can and should be done for less."
After reading all
71 pages of the monitor's May 5, 2017 report on NOPD uses of force, I'm not
certain the functions can be done for less;
if the functions should be done for less, I'm not convinced that
modifying the consent decree is a wise move. Let us recall what Jefferson Beauregard
Sessions III, the 84th U. S. Attorney
General, wrote in 2008 about consent decrees.
"One of the most dangerous, and rarely discussed, exercises of raw
power is the issuance of expansive court decrees. Consent decrees have a profound effect on our
legal system as they constitute an end run around the democratic process."
[[ See "Alabama Policy Institute. (208, 06 24). API Research Consent
Decrees at http://www. alabamapolicy.org/WP-consent/uploads/ API-Research-Consent-Decrees.pdf ]] Mr. Sessions would like to minimize use of
consent decrees in 2017 and maximize "stop, question, and frisk"
policies to stem the rising tide of crime in urban America, and he would get
much support from Senator John Kennedy. Question: Has Judge Charbonnet opened a can of worms
that is labeled "Politics make strange bedfellows"? I invite her to provide an answer.
Read the NOPD Consent Decree at http://www.nola.gov. It is one of the most robust, comprehensive
police consent decrees in the United States of America. It has done some good. There also seems to be some evidence that
citizens in New Orleans are developing more positive views of NOPD since the
decree has been in force. I suggest that
voters in New Orleans try to contextualize very carefully the various public safety plans the candidates
for mayor will offer.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. New Orleans July 18, 2017
Comments
Post a Comment