Education in New Orleans
Imagining Partial Reality
James Boyd White ends Acts
of Hope: Creating Authority in Literature, Law, and Politics (Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1994) with an eloquent remark about Socrates,
Abraham Lincoln, and Nelson Mandela as writers:
None of these writers thought he lived in a just or
perfect world. Everyone saw evil , in
himself and in others; everyone saw
defects of mind and language, in himself and in others. Yet each found a way of living in an unjust
world by imagining an ideal into a partial reality. (307)
Such neoliberal sentiment might encourage fresh thinking
among voters in New Orleans, voters who will elect a mayor and seven city
council members on October 14, 2017.
Each voter knows the city is neither just nor perfect. Each witnesses major and minor evil on a
daily basis. Each is aware of defects of
thought and language in the city's economic and political dialogue, in how
priorities are triaged. Whether each
voter has an equal opportunity to imagine "an ideal into a partial reality"
may be compromised by class, wealth, color, gender or poverty, the dynamics of Realpolitik. In the ambience of imagining, each voter is
the maker of history's narratives (oral or written) as well as the subject of
history's carnivalesque forms.
The materiality of politics can push moral and ethical
issues from the center to the margins, and voters in New Orleans know how politics as
usual can be a Petri dish for corruption and inequities. Many of the voters have mastered cognitive
dissonance. This defense mechanism, as
Jessica Stern and J. M. Berger noted in ISIS:
The State of Terror (New York: Ecco, 2015), kicks in when evidence
indicates that beliefs are wrong; "instead of rejecting their beliefs,
they will often hew to them more strongly still, rationalizing away the
disconfirming evidence" (228). The
mechanism is paramount among cults and various terrorist groups, but upstanding
and honest citizens can be affected by it.
This seems to happened among many voters in post-Katrina New Orleans as they accommodate cognitive
dissonance regarding public education.
Indeed, in the listing to date of major priorities in the forthcoming
election (public safety, infrastructure, economic opportunity, city services,
city finance, and the civil service system), education languishes on the margins. No candidate, as far as I can determine, has
positioned education as a central priority.
This is disturbing, because the minds and life
opportunities for young people in New Orleans are at risk. Have only a handful of voters heard the
clarion call in the Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change's 2005
document on "Structural Racism and Youth Development: Issues, Challenges,
and Implications"? [Visit
https://www.aspeninstitute.org/programs ] Are only a handful of voters troubled
that charter schools "are managed by a private non-profit board,"
which is not exactly held to the same standards of community accountability as the Orleans Parish School
Board and the Recovery School District?
Is it acceptable to de-emphasize the intimate links between education
and economic opportunity, to ignore the possibility that restoring
vocational-technical education in some of the city's public schools might
enable a larger number of young people to qualify for better-paying jobs than
they can have in the service and tourism industries?
If voters in New Orleans want to find a way of
transforming educational inequity into
something better during and after the celebration of the New Orleans Tricentennial (2018), they must insist that all candidates
present reasonable plans for reforming the configuration of education in our
city.
Jerry W. Ward, Jr. July 20, 2017
Comments
Post a Comment